The Full Breadth of Mendel’s Genetics
نویسندگان
چکیده
Gregor Mendel's "Experiments on Plant Hybrids" (1865/1866), published 150 years ago, is without doubt one of the most brilliant works in biology. Curiously, Mendel's later studies on Hieracium (hawkweed) are usually seen as a frustrating failure, because it is assumed that they were intended to confirm the segregation ratios he found in Pisum Had this been his intention, such a confirmation would have failed, since, unknown to Mendel, Hieracium species mostly reproduce by means of clonal seeds (apomixis). Here we show that this assumption arises from a misunderstanding that could be explained by a missing page in Mendel's first letter to Carl Nägeli. Mendel's writings clearly indicate his interest in "constant hybrids," hybrids which do not segregate, and which were "essentially different" from "variable hybrids" such as in Pisum After the Pisum studies, Mendel worked mainly on Hieracium for 7 years where he found constant hybrids and some great surprises. He also continued to explore variable hybrids; both variable and constant hybrids were of interest to Mendel with respect to inheritance and to species evolution. Mendel considered that their similarities and differences might provide deep insights and that their differing behaviors were "individual manifestations of a higher more fundamental law."
منابع مشابه
The Mendelian and Non-Mendelian Origins of Genetics
The story of Gregor Mendel’s long neglect and rediscovery has been criticized for taking Mendel’s paper out of context, both in 1865, when he presented it to the Naturalists’ Society in Brno, and in 1900, when it became a cornerstone of genetics. But what are the proper contexts? Here a case is made for reading Mendel’s paper, in both time periods, as part of a large body of nineteenth-century ...
متن کاملThe lesser-known Mendel: his experiments on Hieracium.
The year 2006 is the 140th anniversary of Mendel’s pathbreaking article. It is appropriate that a journal devoted to genetics begin the year with an article about Mendel and his work. Much has been written about his deep insights and the failure of the biological community to recognize his work. Here, on this anniversary, instead of extolling his success, we present a scholarly account of Mende...
متن کاملPrinciples of Inheritance: Mendel’s Laws and Genetic Models
It is difficult to overstate the impact of Mendel’s research on the history of genetics; indeed, his research in genetics has been credited as one of the great experimental advances in biology (Fisher, 1965). Prior to the publication of his results on experimental hybridization in plants, the concept of inheritance of physical ‘units’ (later called genes) was accepted, and scientists had report...
متن کاملAnecdotal , Historical and Critical Commentaries on Genetics Edited by James F . Crow and William F . Dove Development : Mendel ’ s Legacy to Genetics
From the Editors: This year marks the hundredth year of genetics as a science, while the next two years mark the turning of the millennium. The year 1900 saw the rediscovery of Mendel’s laws by DeVries, Correns, and Tschermak, and the revolution that was set forth by this triple confirmation has had few equals in science. Our way of celebrating this anniversary has been to invite another look a...
متن کاملPrinciples of Inheritance: Mendel’s Laws and Genetic Models
It is difficult to overstate the impact of Mendel’s research on the history of genetics; indeed, his research in genetics has been credited as one of the great experimental advances in biology (Fisher, 1965). Prior to the publication of his results on experimental hybridization in plants, the concept of inheritance of physical ‘units’ (later called genes) was accepted, and scientists had report...
متن کامل